Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Katherine Barnes vs Annabelle Lammas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Barnes vs Lammas analysis and find out who is favored!
Katherine Barnes vs Annabelle Lammas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Barnes 1 - 0 Lammas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Barnes has won 49.05% of points on their second serve, while Lammas has won 27.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Barnes, in recent form, has won 59.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lammas has won 35.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.53% and 23.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Barnes has saved 48.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammas has saved 46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Barnes has won 67.65% of matches played (W/L 23/ 11), with Lammas winning 20% (W/L 3/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Barnes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Lammas has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 24% (W/L 5/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Barnes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7), where as Lammas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Barnes winning 1 times and Lammas being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Barnes winning 2 and Lammas winning 0. The last match between Barnes and Lammas was at the W35 Nottingham, 28-04-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Katherine Barnes getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Barnes and Lammas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Barnes winning 0 times and Lammas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Barnes winning 0, and Lammas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Barnes has played against opponents with an average rank of 119.41 while Lammas has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Barnes has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Barnes has converted 51.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammas has converted 75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (26-17)
Career Total W/L
19% (5-21)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
25% (3-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Katherine Barnes | Annabelle Lammas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (27/44) | 65% (36/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 50% (18/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 76% (13/17) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (31/55) | 30% (13/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Katherine Barnes
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Katherine Barnes | Annabelle Lammas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (3/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 25% (6/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (118/86) | 33% (63/128) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 25% (3/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (379/625) | 54% (129/240) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (227/379) | 48% (62/129) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (128/246) | 27% (30/111) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (42/87) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (315/644) | 28% (56/203) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 25% (3/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Katherine Barnes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Angelica Raggi
Player
Katherine Barnes
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manca Pislak
Player
Katherine Barnes
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Reka-Luca Jani
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
113)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Maya Drozd
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Tatu
Player
Katherine Barnes
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Eliz Maloney
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katherine Barnes
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Ella Mcdonald
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Annabelle Lammas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Barnes
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Annabelle Lammas
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maya Drozd
Player
Annabelle Lammas
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aely Arai
Player
Annabelle Lammas
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Barnes Vs Lammas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
